Double-walled folding boxes 450x200x600 mm (en: 2024BX4166)

(1 Reviews)

SKU: 2024BX4166

1.98 € 1,98 € pro 0 excl. 19% VAT , incl. shipping costs

2.36 € 2,36 € pro 0 incl. 19% VAT , incl. shipping costs

Item	Unit price excluding VAT	Unit price including VAT
From 195 pcs. pcs. each 195	1,98 €	2,36 €*
From 390 pcs. pcs. each 390	1,60 €	1,90 €*
From 570 pcs. pcs. each 570	1,51 €	1,80 €*
From 960 pcs. pcs. each 960	1,34 €	1,59 €*

Delivery time: 2 - 3 weeks (DE - int. shipments may differ)

pcs.

Please note the minimum purchase quantity of 195 pcs..

Please note the permissible order quantity of 15 pcs..

Description
Reviews

Here, compromises in storage space are unnecessary! The durable folding boxes with a robust BC flute are ideal for a wide variety of products, whether lightweight or heavy. The boxes can be easily sealed with tape and prepared for shipping.

To minimize storage requirements in your premises, the boxes are delivered flat.

Made from first-class recycled materials for reliable protection of your goods
Storage is particularly space-saving due to flat delivery (usually in bundles)
The boxes are constructed according to FEFCO 0201 with butt-jointed top and bottom flaps.
Depending on the application, suitable for light to medium-weight goods up to about 10 kg.
Can be securely closed with conventional adhesive tapes.
Recyclable thanks to Resy license.

The dimensions given correspond to the internal dimensions of the box and are represented in the order length x width x height.

length:	450
width:	200
construction:	FEFCO 0201
quality:	2.30
colour:	brown
high altitude grooves:	no
heigh:	600
Item weight:	0,51 kg
Dimensions ( Length × Width × Height ):	45,00 × 20,00 × 60,00 cm

Hersteller:

BOXXCO GmbH & Co. KG, Heideweg 5, Deutschland, Kontakt: kontakt@boxxco.com

Average item rating

All reviews:

How do reviews work?

Total entries: 1

Solider Karton, leichte Mängel
Die Kartons sind stabil und gut verarbeitet, ideal für den Versand leichterer Güter. Allerdings waren einige Kartons leicht beschädigt. Für schwere Inhalte würde ich eine stabilere Variante empfehlen. Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis ist angemessen, aber die Qualitätskontrolle könnte verbessert werden.

Gwendolyn A. , 13.04.2025

Total entries: 1